-
CAD Models
-
- CAD Model: CGH-S9-C9_A.step
- CAD Model: CGH-S9-C0_A.step
- CAD Model: CGH-S6-C6_A.step
- CAD Model: CGH-S6-C0_A.step
- CAD Model: CGH-S3-C6_A.step
- CAD Model: CGH-S3-C3_A.step
- CAD Model: CGH-S3-C0_A.step
- CAD Model: C6XXXC_A.step
- CAD Model: C4XXXC_A.step
- CAD Model: C3XXXs_A.step
- CAD Model: C2XXXS-BC.step 2-Inch Cylinder CGH
-
-
Documentation
-
- Customer Drawing: MP6-BLANK_A
- Customer Drawing: MP3-BLANK_A
- Customer Drawing: VRT-050_A
- Customer Drawing: CRT-050_A
- Customer Drawing: C6AC3_A
- Customer Drawing: C6R_A
- Customer Drawing: FP9-H600_A
- Customer Drawing: FP6-H600_B
- Customer Drawing: FP6-H425_B
- Customer Drawing: FP3-Z-H600_B
- Customer Drawing: FP3-Z-H425_B
- Customer Drawing: FP3-H600_A
- Customer Drawing: FP3-H425_A
- Customer Drawing: CGH-S9-C9_A
- Customer Drawing: CGH-S9-C0_A
- Customer Drawing: CGH-S6-C6_A
- Customer Drawing: CGH-S6-C0_A
- Customer Drawing: CGH-S3-C6_A
- Customer Drawing: CGH-S3-C3_A
- Customer Drawing: CGH-S3-C0_A
- Customer Drawing: C6XXXC_A
- Customer Drawing: C4XXXC_A
- Customer Drawing: C3XXXS_A
- Customer Drawing: C2XXXS-BC 2-Inch Cylinder CGH
- Customer Drawing: FP6-Z-H650_A
- Show Remaining Articles ( 10 ) Collapse Articles
-
-
- About Morpheus and Installation
- 1. Preparing Metrology Measurements for Morpheus™
- 2. Loading Data into Morpheus™
- 3. Processing the Data in Morpheus™
- 4. Substrate Correction
- 5. Mapping Correction
- 6. Fitting and Removing Alignment Errors
- 7. Analyzing Uncertainty Stack-up
- 8. Generating a Report
- 9. Exporting Data
- 10. Reporting Feedback
- 11. Reporting a Bug
- Glossary
- About
- AOM Software License Agreement
-
-
-
Publications
-
- [2025] Metrology for efficient assembly, integration, and testing of space telescopes
- [2025] Rethinking alignment for systems that incorporate freeform optics
- [2025] Parametric relations for coupling wavefront measurements, mechanical misalignment, and operational performance for imaging systems
- [2025] Kinematic interfaces for freeform optics for efficient manufacture, test, and system assembly
- [2025] Applications of computer generated holograms for measuring X-ray and EUV optics
- [2023] New Applications of Computer Generated Holograms for Optical Testing
- [2023] Rapid surface metrology of freeform shapes using CGH interferometry
- [2022] Snapshot measurements with CGH interferometry to support volume production of freeform optics
- [2022] Computer generated hologram (CGH) education kit for hands-on learning of optical metrology for complex optics and systems
- [2022] CGH-assisted metrology testbed for the Thirty Meter Telescope primary mirror
- [2021] Metrology Testbed for the Thirty Meter Telescope Primary Mirror
- [2019] Interferometric Metrology for the TMT Primary Mirror Segments: Design and Analysis
- [2018] Infrared computer-generated holograms: design and application for the WFIRST grism using wavelength-tuning interferometry
- [2016] Optical Alignment with CGH Phase References
- [2014] Precision Alignment And Calibration Of Optical Systems Using Computer Generated Holograms
- [2014] Diffractive optics calibrator: measurement of etching variations for binary computer-generated holograms
- [2013] Optical testing with computer generated holograms: comprehensive error analysis
- [2013] Design and analysis of an alignment procedure using computer-generated holograms
- [2011] Low uncertainty alignment procedure using computer generated holograms
- [2010] Imaging issues for interferometry with CGH null correctors
- [2010] Measurement of aspheric mirror segments using Fizeau interferometry with CGH correction
- [2009] Fizeau interferometer with spherical reference and CGH correction for measuring large convex aspheres
- [2007] Fabrication error analysis and experimental demonstration for computer-generated holograms
- [2007] Optical alignment with computer-generated holograms
- [2007] Optimal design of computer-generated holograms to minimize sensitivity to fabrication errors
- [2007] Coupling of surface roughness to the performance of computer-generated holograms
- [2006] Analysis of phase sensitivity for binary computer-generated holograms
- [2006] Absolute calibration of null correctors using twin computer-generated holograms
- [2006] Use of computer generated holograms for alignment of complex null correctors
- [2005] Testing an off-axis parabola with a CGH and a spherical mirror as null lens
- [2004] Efficient testing of segmented aspherical mirrors by use of reference plate and computer-generated holograms. I. Theory and system optimization
- [2004] Efficient testing of segmented aspherical mirrors by use of a reference plate and computer-generated holograms. II. Case study, error analysis, and experimental validation
- [1999] Efficient testing of off-axis aspheres with test plates and computer-generated holograms
- [1999] Error analysis for CGH optical testing
- [1999] Diffraction wavefront analysis of computer-generated holograms
- [1995] Applications of computer-generated holograms for interferometric measurement of large aspheric optics
- Show Remaining Articles ( 21 ) Collapse Articles
-
-
FAQs
-
- What is a CGH (Computer-Generated Hologram)?
- How are CGHs used?
- What is a "null"?
- What is a "UUT"?
- How is a CGH mounted and adjusted?
- What types of surfaces can be measured using a CGH?
- What is the typical accuracy of a CGH?
- What are the benefits of using a CGH for metrology?
- What is CGH substrate error and how does it get subtracted?
- What are fiducial dots and how are they used?
- Are CGHs delicate?
- How do you clean a CGH?
- What is a Metrology Platform?
- What type of interferometer do I need to use a CGH?
- What is diffraction efficiency?
- What is the difference between an amplitude and a phase CGH?
- How is a CGH different from other types of holograms?
- What size CGHs does AOM produce?
- Do CGHs require regular calibration?
- How are CGHs made?
- Show Remaining Articles ( 5 ) Collapse Articles
-
-
How-To's
-
- What is a Datum?
- The Importance of UUT Alignment
- [VIDEO] Freeform CGH Metrology Demonstration: Step-by-Step Instructions
- [VIDEO] Metrology Platform for Easy and Precise Alignment in Freeform Optical Testing
- [VIDEO] Aligning a CGH Test
- [VIDEO] How to Measure a Cylinder Optic
- UUT Datum and Optical Coordinate Definitions
- CGH Test Alignment Correction with Morpheus
- [2026] Datum Based Metrology for Freeform Optics
-
Technologies
-
-
- Arc Focus Reference Alignment Patterns (AF)
- Crosshair Point Focus (PF-X)
- Line Focus Reference Alignment Patterns (LF)
- Confocal Point Focus Alignment Pattern (PF-C)
- Catseye Pair Alignment Pattern (CE-P)
- Catseye Single Alignment Pattern (CE-S)
- Collimation Alignment Pattern (CO)
- Visual Point Focus Alignment Pattern (PF-V)
-
-
[2025] Metrology for efficient assembly, integration, and testing of space telescopes
J. H. Burge, E. LaVilla, C. K. Merle, and T. Steele “Metrology for efficient assembly, integration, and testing of space telescopes”, Proc. SPIE 13624, Astronomical Optics: Design, Manufacture, and Test of Space and Ground Systems V, 136240P (18 September 2025)
Abstract:
The rapid expansion of space-based optical systems for earth observation, communications, defense, and science applications has created an unprecedented demand for precision telescope manufacturing at production volumes. Traditional alignment, integration, and testing methodologies, while effective for one-off specialized systems, do not scale well. For manufacturing a single system, considerable effort goes into the design of the system that is assembled by experts. For production, investment must be made in tooling and procedures so the manufacturing can be done efficiently by technicians. Much of the work in building optical systems is defined by the metrology – surfaces and alignment are adjusted until they are measured to meet the stringent performance criteria. For efficient production, the measurement systems must be optimized for each critical operation and must be integrated into the manufacturing plan. Some examples are presented that have successfully used computergenerated holograms (CGHs) for space telescope production. The measurement of each of the mirrors is measured using interferometry with CGHs, including calibration for gravity. As the optical components are built into their subassemblies, CGH testing is used to validate alignment and effects of bonding. The critical alignment of the secondary mirror can be accomplished efficiently using the Argus Alignment Method, which uses a CGH to provide simultaneous alignment and wavefront measurements. An additional CGH measures the complete optical system over its field of view and provides definition for the focal plane assembly. In many cases, a final test with a CGH projecting structured light into the system coupled with motion of scan mirrors verifies the image quality all the way to the focal plane.