-
CAD Models
-
- CAD Model: CGH-S9-C9_A.step
- CAD Model: CGH-S9-C0_A.step
- CAD Model: CGH-S6-C6_A.step
- CAD Model: CGH-S6-C0_A.step
- CAD Model: CGH-S3-C6_A.step
- CAD Model: CGH-S3-C3_A.step
- CAD Model: CGH-S3-C0_A.step
- CAD Model: C6XXXC_A.step
- CAD Model: C4XXXC_A.step
- CAD Model: C3XXXs_A.step
- CAD Model: C2XXXS-BC.step 2-Inch Cylinder CGH
-
-
Documentation
-
- Customer Drawing: MP6-BLANK_A
- Customer Drawing: MP3-BLANK_A
- Customer Drawing: VRT-050_A
- Customer Drawing: CRT-050_A
- Customer Drawing: C6AC3_A
- Customer Drawing: C6R_A
- Customer Drawing: FP9-H600_A
- Customer Drawing: FP6-H600_B
- Customer Drawing: FP6-H425_B
- Customer Drawing: FP3-Z-H600_B
- Customer Drawing: FP3-Z-H425_B
- Customer Drawing: FP3-H600_A
- Customer Drawing: FP3-H425_A
- Customer Drawing: CGH-S9-C9_A
- Customer Drawing: CGH-S9-C0_A
- Customer Drawing: CGH-S6-C6_A
- Customer Drawing: CGH-S6-C0_A
- Customer Drawing: CGH-S3-C6_A
- Customer Drawing: CGH-S3-C3_A
- Customer Drawing: CGH-S3-C0_A
- Customer Drawing: C6XXXC_A
- Customer Drawing: C4XXXC_A
- Customer Drawing: C3XXXS_A
- Customer Drawing: C2XXXS-BC 2-Inch Cylinder CGH
- Customer Drawing: FP6-Z-H650_A
- Show Remaining Articles ( 10 ) Collapse Articles
-
-
- About Morpheus and Installation
- 1. Preparing Metrology Measurements for Morpheus™
- 2. Loading Data into Morpheus™
- 3. Processing the Data in Morpheus™
- 4. Substrate Correction
- 5. Mapping Correction
- 6. Fitting and Removing Alignment Errors
- 7. Analyzing Uncertainty Stack-up
- 8. Generating a Report
- 9. Exporting Data
- 10. Reporting Feedback
- 11. Reporting a Bug
- Glossary
- About
- AOM Software License Agreement
-
-
-
Publications
-
- [2025] Metrology for efficient assembly, integration, and testing of space telescopes
- [2025] Rethinking alignment for systems that incorporate freeform optics
- [2025] Parametric relations for coupling wavefront measurements, mechanical misalignment, and operational performance for imaging systems
- [2025] Kinematic interfaces for freeform optics for efficient manufacture, test, and system assembly
- [2025] Applications of computer generated holograms for measuring X-ray and EUV optics
- [2023] New Applications of Computer Generated Holograms for Optical Testing
- [2023] Rapid surface metrology of freeform shapes using CGH interferometry
- [2022] Snapshot measurements with CGH interferometry to support volume production of freeform optics
- [2022] Computer generated hologram (CGH) education kit for hands-on learning of optical metrology for complex optics and systems
- [2022] CGH-assisted metrology testbed for the Thirty Meter Telescope primary mirror
- [2021] Metrology Testbed for the Thirty Meter Telescope Primary Mirror
- [2019] Interferometric Metrology for the TMT Primary Mirror Segments: Design and Analysis
- [2018] Infrared computer-generated holograms: design and application for the WFIRST grism using wavelength-tuning interferometry
- [2016] Optical Alignment with CGH Phase References
- [2014] Precision Alignment And Calibration Of Optical Systems Using Computer Generated Holograms
- [2014] Diffractive optics calibrator: measurement of etching variations for binary computer-generated holograms
- [2013] Optical testing with computer generated holograms: comprehensive error analysis
- [2013] Design and analysis of an alignment procedure using computer-generated holograms
- [2011] Low uncertainty alignment procedure using computer generated holograms
- [2010] Imaging issues for interferometry with CGH null correctors
- [2010] Measurement of aspheric mirror segments using Fizeau interferometry with CGH correction
- [2009] Fizeau interferometer with spherical reference and CGH correction for measuring large convex aspheres
- [2007] Fabrication error analysis and experimental demonstration for computer-generated holograms
- [2007] Optical alignment with computer-generated holograms
- [2007] Optimal design of computer-generated holograms to minimize sensitivity to fabrication errors
- [2007] Coupling of surface roughness to the performance of computer-generated holograms
- [2006] Analysis of phase sensitivity for binary computer-generated holograms
- [2006] Absolute calibration of null correctors using twin computer-generated holograms
- [2006] Use of computer generated holograms for alignment of complex null correctors
- [2005] Testing an off-axis parabola with a CGH and a spherical mirror as null lens
- [2004] Efficient testing of segmented aspherical mirrors by use of reference plate and computer-generated holograms. I. Theory and system optimization
- [2004] Efficient testing of segmented aspherical mirrors by use of a reference plate and computer-generated holograms. II. Case study, error analysis, and experimental validation
- [1999] Efficient testing of off-axis aspheres with test plates and computer-generated holograms
- [1999] Error analysis for CGH optical testing
- [1999] Diffraction wavefront analysis of computer-generated holograms
- [1995] Applications of computer-generated holograms for interferometric measurement of large aspheric optics
- Show Remaining Articles ( 21 ) Collapse Articles
-
-
FAQs
-
- What is a CGH (Computer-Generated Hologram)?
- How are CGHs used?
- What is a "null"?
- What is a "UUT"?
- How is a CGH mounted and adjusted?
- What types of surfaces can be measured using a CGH?
- What is the typical accuracy of a CGH?
- What are the benefits of using a CGH for metrology?
- What is CGH substrate error and how does it get subtracted?
- What are fiducial dots and how are they used?
- Are CGHs delicate?
- How do you clean a CGH?
- What is a Metrology Platform?
- What type of interferometer do I need to use a CGH?
- What is diffraction efficiency?
- What is the difference between an amplitude and a phase CGH?
- How is a CGH different from other types of holograms?
- What size CGHs does AOM produce?
- Do CGHs require regular calibration?
- How are CGHs made?
- Show Remaining Articles ( 5 ) Collapse Articles
-
-
How-To's
-
- What is a Datum?
- The Importance of UUT Alignment
- [VIDEO] Freeform CGH Metrology Demonstration: Step-by-Step Instructions
- [VIDEO] Metrology Platform for Easy and Precise Alignment in Freeform Optical Testing
- [VIDEO] Aligning a CGH Test
- [VIDEO] How to Measure a Cylinder Optic
- UUT Datum and Optical Coordinate Definitions
- CGH Test Alignment Correction with Morpheus
- [2026] Datum Based Metrology for Freeform Optics
-
Technologies
-
-
- Arc Focus Reference Alignment Patterns (AF)
- Crosshair Point Focus (PF-X)
- Line Focus Reference Alignment Patterns (LF)
- Confocal Point Focus Alignment Pattern (PF-C)
- Catseye Pair Alignment Pattern (CE-P)
- Catseye Single Alignment Pattern (CE-S)
- Collimation Alignment Pattern (CO)
- Visual Point Focus Alignment Pattern (PF-V)
-
-
Chang, Yu-Chun. Diffraction wavefront analysis of computer-generated holograms. The University of Arizona, 1999.
Abstract:
Computer-generated holograms (CGHs) use diffraction to create wavefronts of light with desired amplitude and phase variations. The amplitude control is well known. But the sensitivity of phase, which is most important for some applications, such as interferometry, is less known. This dissertation studies phase errors resulted from design and fabrication limitations of CGHs. Fabrication uncertainties of CGHs are primarily responsible for the degradation of the quality of wavefronts generated by CGHs. In this dissertation, the binary linear diffraction model is introduced to study wavefront phase errors caused by substrate figure errors, pattern distortion, grating duty-cycle and etching depth errors. Wavefront sensitivity functions derived from diffraction model provide analytical solutions to estimate phase deviations due to duty-cycle or phase depth variations. The results of the wavefront sensitivity analysis also enable us to identify hologram structures that are the most sensitive, as well as the least sensitive to fabrication uncertainties. Experiments were conducted to validate the diffraction model. Example error budgets for common CGH optical testing configurations are demonstrated. In addition, a graphical representation of the diffraction fields is introduced. It provides an intuitive way for diffraction wavefront analysis and explains phase discontinuous observed in the diffraction model. Scalar diffraction models are commonly used in CGH analysis and modeling due to their computational simplicity compared with rigorous diffraction models. The validity of the scalar diffraction models becomes unclear when they are used to analyze diffractive elements with wavelength-scaled features. This dissertation discusses the validity of the scalar diffraction models with giving emphasis to wavefront phase. Fourier modal method (FMM) derived from rigorous diffraction theory is used to study a binary zone plate. The result of this analysis is compared with experimental data, This study shows that polarization sensitivities of the hologram are almost negligible for the chrome-on-glass zone plate with a minimum ring spacing of 2lambda. This result implies that scalar diffraction models may still be sufficient for modeling the phase from holograms with wavelength-scaled diffraction features for the case studied in this dissertation.